b'Fire Engineering Assessment, Revision 01 DeltaCool, DeltaSecrectFix, DeltaTrim at 100 mm and 75 mm Fire Performance, Project No. 25367 25367-SFE-FEA-01-Delta Panel Fire Performance Based on the test results, it is clear that the paint and the adhesive do not significantly contribute to the fire hazard of the 100 mm thick DeltaCool panel. The paint and adhesive remain consistent between the DeltaCool, DeltaSecretFix, and DeltaTrim panels with only variations in the skin profile in each panel. Both the DeltaCool and DeltaSecretFix panels are flat with a negligible difference in the painted coating or the adhesive. The profiled skin of a DeltaTrim panel would have a greater surface area which means a greater area of the painted coating and the adhesive layer. ThequantityofthepaintedcoatingortheadhesivelayerbylinearmetrefortheDeltaTrimpanelis approximately increased by 7%. But as the tested sample has a nearly unrecognisable impact on the HRR, a minor variation of approximately 7% would not be expected to cause an impact on the HRR in the order of magnitude that would be required to achieve an HRR of 1 MW.Figure 4-13Heat Release Rate (HRR) of Specimen and Burner during testing (pg. 19, RTF252619 R1.0 by Jensen Hughes). The proposed panelling systems to inherit the testing of the 100 mm thick DeltaCool panel with a mineral wool core are outlined in Table 4-1. Table 4-1Proposed Panels with a similar fire performance to the 100 mm thick DeltaCool panel with a mineral wool core PanelCoreThicknessofCoreCross Section Figure (indicative) (nominal) DeltaCoolMineral Wool75 mmFigure 4-13 DeltaSecretFixMineral Wool100 mmFigure 4-14 DeltaSecretFixMineral Wool75 mmFigure 4-14 DeltaTrimMineral Wool100 mmFigure 4-11 Page 24'